Skip to content

Quantum Numbers

Easychemistry

Which set of quantum numbers is NOT possible for an electron in an atom according to the rules governing quantum mechanical description of electrons?

Select the correct option:

🔒 Solution Hidden from View

Submit your answer to unlock the detailed step-by-step solution.

About This Question

Subject
chemistry
Chapter
atomic structure
Topic
quantum numbers
Difficulty
Easy
Year
2025
Tags
quantum numbersprincipal quantum numbermagnetic quantum numberspin quantum numberallowed values

Solution

Correct Answer:

The rules governing quantum numbers are: n must be a positive integer; l ranges from 0 to n-1; m_l ranges from -l to +l; m_s is either +1/2 or -1/2. Examining each option: n=3, l=2 is valid because l ≤ n-1=2; m_l=-2 is valid since |m_l| ≤ l=2; m_s=+1/2 is valid. n=2, l=1 is valid; m_l=0 is within range; m_s=-1/2 is valid. For n=4, l=3: l=3 ≤ n-1=3 is valid, but m_l=+4 is NOT valid because m_l can only range from -3 to +3, so +4 exceeds the limit. Hence this set is impossible. n=1, l=0, m_l=0, m_s=-1/2 perfectly satisfies all rules for a 1s electron. The invalid option n=4, l=3, m_l=+4 violates the rule that m_l cannot exceed l in magnitude. This is a standard NCERT/JEE concept on quantum number restrictions. Plausibility check: m_l=+4 with l=3 clearly breaks the boundary condition, confirming it as the impossible set.

This easy difficulty chemistry question is from the chapter atomic structure, covering the topic of quantum numbers. It appeared in the 2025 exam.

Looking for more practice? Explore all chemistry questions or browse atomic structure questions on RankGuru.