Reduction And Standard Forms
Evaluate the definite integral from zero to \infty of e raised to negative x multiplied by x, recognizing the Gamma-function pattern embedded in this improper integral.
Select the correct option:
🔒 Solution Hidden from View
Submit your answer to unlock the detailed step-by-step solution.
More integral calculus Practice Questions
Considering the greatest integer function within the integrand, evaluate the definite integral from ...
Considering the greatest integer function within the integrand, evaluate the definite integral from ...
The figure shows the curve y equals four minus x-squared sitting above the x-axis between its two ro...
The figure shows the curve y equals four minus x-squared sitting above the x-axis between its two ro...
Exploiting the periodicity of the absolute sine function, evaluate the definite integral of the abso...
Exploiting the periodicity of the absolute sine function, evaluate the definite integral of the abso...
Find the indefinite integral of one over the square root of the quantity a-squared minus x-squared a...
Find the indefinite integral of one over the square root of the quantity a-squared minus x-squared a...
Evaluate the definite integral from zero to \pi/2 of cosine raised to the fourth power, applying the...
Evaluate the definite integral from zero to \pi/2 of cosine raised to the fourth power, applying the...
The region under one full arch of the sine curve from zero to \pi is shaded in the figure; calculate...
The region under one full arch of the sine curve from zero to \pi is shaded in the figure; calculate...
Assertion: the integral from zero to two of the function defined as x for x below one and as two min...
Assertion: the integral from zero to two of the function defined as x for x below one and as two min...
The shaded region lies between the parabola y equals x-squared and the line y equals x as drawn; det...
The shaded region lies between the parabola y equals x-squared and the line y equals x as drawn; det...
Determine the indefinite integral of the natural logarithm of x treated as a single function, using ...
Determine the indefinite integral of the natural logarithm of x treated as a single function, using ...
Using the Weierstrass half-angle substitution, evaluate the indefinite integral of one divided by th...
Using the Weierstrass half-angle substitution, evaluate the indefinite integral of one divided by th...
By treating the expression as a Riemann sum, evaluate the limit as n tends to \infty of the sum of ...
By treating the expression as a Riemann sum, evaluate the limit as n tends to \infty of the sum of ...
If a function F is defined as the integral from one to x of the reciprocal of t, then differentiate ...
If a function F is defined as the integral from one to x of the reciprocal of t, then differentiate ...
About This Question
- Subject
- mathematics
- Chapter
- integral calculus
- Topic
- reduction and standard forms
- Difficulty
- Medium
- Year
- 2025
Solution
Correct Answer:
1
This improper integral matches the Gamma function pattern, the integral that generalizes factorials to a continuous setting and converges whenever the exponential decay dominates polynomial growth. The defining relation is \Gamma(n) = \int_0^\infty x^{n-1} e^{-x},dx, which for positive integers reduces to \Gamma(n) = (n-1)!. Here the integrand x e^{-x} corresponds to n - 1 = 1, so n = 2 and \Gamma(2) = 1! = 1. Equivalently, integrating by parts with u = x and dv = e^{-x},dx yields [-x e^{-x}]_0^\infty + \int_0^\infty e^{-x},dx. The boundary term vanishes because e^{-x} decays far faster than x grows, sending the product to zero at \infty, and the remaining integral equals [-e^{-x}]_0^\infty = 1. Option 0 ignores the surviving exponential integral after the boundary term dies. Option 2 would correspond to \Gamma(3) = 2!, which needs an extra power of x. Option \infty wrongly assumes divergence despite the dominant exponential decay guaranteeing convergence. The Gamma framework systematizes a whole family of such improper integrals. As a final plausibility check, the integrand is positive throughout and decays rapidly to zero as x grows, so a finite positive value near 1 is fully consistent with the integral converging, and the factorial identity \Gamma(2) = 1! anchors the answer to a familiar discrete value.
This medium difficulty mathematics question is from the chapter integral calculus, covering the topic of reduction and standard forms. It appeared in the 2025 exam.
Looking for more practice? Explore all mathematics questions or browse integral calculus questions on RankGuru.