Chlorine attached to a benzene ring exerts two opposing electronic effects. Through its high electronegativity it withdraws electron density inductively, deactivating the ring and slowing electrophilic substitution overall. However, chlorine also possesses lone pairs that it donates into the ring by resonance, and these resonance structures place extra negative charge specifically at the ortho and para positions. Because the electrophile seeks the most electron-rich sites, substitution occurs mainly ortho and para, even though the ring as a whole is deactivated. The uniform-density option is wrong because the resonance donation is selective, concentrating charge at ortho and para, not everywhere equally. The meta-directing option is incorrect because meta direction is typical of purely electron-withdrawing groups lacking donatable lone pairs, unlike chlorine. The steric option is wrong because both ortho and para products form; direction is electronic, not purely steric. The apparent paradox of a deactivating yet ortho-para directing group is resolved by recognising that the inductive withdrawal controls the overall rate, slowing every position, while the resonance donation controls the regioselectivity, sparing the ortho and para sites from the worst destabilisation in the intermediate. The para product usually dominates over ortho because the ortho position suffers additional steric and electronic strain near the bulky electronegative chlorine. This matches the NCERT explanation of halogens as deactivating yet ortho-para directing. Sanity check: resonance enriches ortho and para, so the electrophile lands there.